Deer Density
- Boogieman1
- 500 Club
- Posts: 6590
- Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2017 11:18 pm
- Status: Offline
Deer Density
Does anyone know how they calculate this? Is this one of those stats that are just meaningless, like hunter density! Where they just take the number of licensed sold and divide by acreage in the state without removing towns, cities and places there are no deer plus easy to access spots that's get the bulk of pressure but others get almost none. The reason I ask is I saw somewhere on here talking about 5 deer per square mile being awful and might go a season without seeing a deer. So I looked up my area and it was .8 deer per square mile. Lol it's not that bad by my states standards my area has real low deer numbers but it's not like it's a dead zone eithier. With the limited amount of timber however and all land being small lots averaging prob 60 acres, with each of the parcels being leased by 3 to 5 hunters I'm betting my pressure ranks up there with the best of em.
Life is hard; It’s even harder if you are stupid.
-John Wayne-
-John Wayne-
-
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 9:34 am
- Status: Offline
Re: Deer Density
I know aerial surveys are a big part of how the MN DNR comes up with their numbers. I think they extrapolate the numbers they actually see into a greater estimated herd count. How they come up with that algorithm I have no idea.
Emrah
Emrah
-
- 500 Club
- Posts: 4576
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 5:26 am
- Location: IA
- Status: Offline
Re: Deer Density
Usually its deer per square mile of permanent (year round) habitat. Meaning ag fields and open water is not supposed to be included.
In reality, yes it is nearly meaningless. Everyone has a little different formula and gathers data in different ways. Roadkill counts, harvest data, aerial surveys, hunter feedback etc. No idea what ways are more accurate than others. I always use the example of two areas I am familiar with, southern WI and eastern IA. According to numbers I have heard some counties in each of these areas have similar deer densities. That's a joke. Numbers in southern Wisconsin have rebounded some in the last few years but they are still no where close to any county in eastern Iowa that I have spent time in. So somebody is either clueless or lyin...maybe everybody
I suspect other parts of the country are equally off.
In reality, yes it is nearly meaningless. Everyone has a little different formula and gathers data in different ways. Roadkill counts, harvest data, aerial surveys, hunter feedback etc. No idea what ways are more accurate than others. I always use the example of two areas I am familiar with, southern WI and eastern IA. According to numbers I have heard some counties in each of these areas have similar deer densities. That's a joke. Numbers in southern Wisconsin have rebounded some in the last few years but they are still no where close to any county in eastern Iowa that I have spent time in. So somebody is either clueless or lyin...maybe everybody
I suspect other parts of the country are equally off.
- elk yinzer
- 500 Club
- Posts: 1229
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2017 5:39 am
- Location: Central PA
- Status: Offline
Re: Deer Density
A wildlife biologist once told me turd counts are considered one of the more reliable methods.
I am a big woods hunter and what vexes me is that you have 50 acres that supports 10 deer, and 500 acres of lesser habitat that holds 2. They are not evenly distributed whatsoever, so why even pretend a density is relevant absent context.
I am a big woods hunter and what vexes me is that you have 50 acres that supports 10 deer, and 500 acres of lesser habitat that holds 2. They are not evenly distributed whatsoever, so why even pretend a density is relevant absent context.
Treasurer, United Bowhunters of PA
https://ubofpa.org/membership-3
https://ubofpa.org/membership-3
- stash59
- Moderator
- Posts: 10077
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:22 am
- Location: S Central Wi.
- Status: Offline
Re: Deer Density
I've read how they do the turd counts. They use transect lines. Walk those lines count the turd piles. Then have some kind of formula to calculate herd numbers. But with budget cuts they may not be able to do this anymore. Same with aerial surveylance. Pretty pricey to fly airplanes these days. Maybe they're going to drones for this!!!
Boogie .8 per sq. mi. is very low. In your case it may be total acreage, not just usable habitat. The area I hunted in northern Wi was and still is around 10/sq. mi. Some of the lowest in the state.
Boogie .8 per sq. mi. is very low. In your case it may be total acreage, not just usable habitat. The area I hunted in northern Wi was and still is around 10/sq. mi. Some of the lowest in the state.
Happiness is a large gutpile!!!!!!!
- headgear
- 500 Club
- Posts: 11625
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 7:21 am
- Location: Northern Minnesota
- Status: Offline
Re: Deer Density
stash59 wrote:Boogie .8 per sq. mi. is very low.
Ya something is off here, one place I hunt is almost in Canada and we have around 7dpsm. Not saying places with 1-2 dpsm don't exist but we are talking way up in no mans land. Where do you hunt Boogie?
- elk yinzer
- 500 Club
- Posts: 1229
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2017 5:39 am
- Location: Central PA
- Status: Offline
Re: Deer Density
I pretty regularly hunt areas that are almost certainly less than 10 dpsm. I have also hunted areas with at least 100 dpsm. In either case I was pretty confident the mature buck per square mile was about the same, but it sure is a different mental game!
Treasurer, United Bowhunters of PA
https://ubofpa.org/membership-3
https://ubofpa.org/membership-3
- Jonny
- 500 Club
- Posts: 5755
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 3:11 am
- Location: In a van down by the river
- Status: Offline
Re: Deer Density
Pretty sure it’s also based off road kills and hunter surveys
You have a monkey Mr. Munson?
- brancher147
- 500 Club
- Posts: 1414
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 3:46 am
- Location: West Virginia
- Status: Offline
Re: Deer Density
In WV the DNR does spotlight surveys in late summer before acorns start falling. The other methods I have heard mentioned do not sound that accurate. Of course even spotlight surveys are only so accurate.
Some do. Some don't. I just might...
- PK_
- 500 Club
- Posts: 6894
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:10 am
- Location: Just Off
- Status: Offline
Re: Deer Density
They use track counts down south. They plow firebreaks to ‘grid’ off sections then count the fresh tracks the next day. They factor in average home range size and other scientifical stuff...
No Shortcuts. No Excuses. No Regrets.
Everybody's selling dreams. I'm too cheap to buy one.
Everybody's selling dreams. I'm too cheap to buy one.
Rich M wrote:Typically, hunting FL has been like getting a root canal
- Southern Man
- 500 Club
- Posts: 3827
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:04 am
- Location: Extreme Western Kentucky
- Status: Offline
Re: Deer Density
Deer densities aren't good for specifics. It's only an average and based on spot checks, however they count it. All it really tells you is there's not many deer in this area but a whole bunch in this area.
On a huge piece of public here (land between the lakes) they have been doing deer surveys for quite some time. It's no secret the deer herd is declining and they are trying to find out why. On the KY side they say there is 10 deer / square mile and on the TN side there is 19 deer / square mile. But that's only an average and not specific to any particular spot. We hunt an area on the KY side that holds more deer than that... easily. But I do know areas on the KY side that you will be hard pressed to ever see a deer. It's only an average and not spot specific.
So, that info is not really any good to a hunter except to say there is deer here but you have to find them or in case of high deer densities, there's alot of deer here and pretty easy to find them. The info is good for them and making decisions on herd management but not for the average hunter.
On a huge piece of public here (land between the lakes) they have been doing deer surveys for quite some time. It's no secret the deer herd is declining and they are trying to find out why. On the KY side they say there is 10 deer / square mile and on the TN side there is 19 deer / square mile. But that's only an average and not specific to any particular spot. We hunt an area on the KY side that holds more deer than that... easily. But I do know areas on the KY side that you will be hard pressed to ever see a deer. It's only an average and not spot specific.
So, that info is not really any good to a hunter except to say there is deer here but you have to find them or in case of high deer densities, there's alot of deer here and pretty easy to find them. The info is good for them and making decisions on herd management but not for the average hunter.
You Can't Argue With A Sick Mind
- <DK>
- 500 Club
- Posts: 4484
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 10:02 am
- Status: Offline
Re: Deer Density
Does this seem reliable to you guys? Found it on the google machine search
http://maps.adventuremapping.com/whitet ... _map_1.asp
http://maps.adventuremapping.com/whitet ... _map_1.asp
- <DK>
- 500 Club
- Posts: 4484
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 10:02 am
- Status: Offline
Re: Deer Density
That map I posted is tough to gauge...
Boogieman, that map matches the stats you found as well. Props for getting the chances that you have so far this season.
Boogieman, that map matches the stats you found as well. Props for getting the chances that you have so far this season.
- Lu Rome
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 4:30 pm
- Location: Nebraska
- Status: Offline
Re: Deer Density
Darkknight54 wrote:Does this seem reliable to you guys? Found it on the google machine search
http://maps.adventuremapping.com/whitet ... _map_1.asp
That's an interesting map, Dark. It looks like it's built off of state published harvest data and it looks like there are several different years, not all of it's current.
I don't have time now to dive into how a lot of the different surveys are done, but overall, the biggest thing isn't the calculated number, but the overall trend from year to year which is important. I'll try to dive into some of the methods later tonight.
“Curiosity never killed the cat. The cat died from stupidity, or maybe an overdose of mice.” -The Old Man
- headgear
- 500 Club
- Posts: 11625
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 7:21 am
- Location: Northern Minnesota
- Status: Offline
Re: Deer Density
That is deer "harvest" density, not deer population density, so different things. Even then I'm not sure how accurate that is.
-
- Advertisement
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests