PK_ wrote:I generally avoid going anywhere near them if I can. Just my reclusive nature is guess.
So what about hacking to view WiFi cams??? It is already being done...
I'm too stupid to hack anything. Haha
PK_ wrote:I generally avoid going anywhere near them if I can. Just my reclusive nature is guess.
So what about hacking to view WiFi cams??? It is already being done...
Eddiegomes83 wrote:Kraftd wrote:I've not done it, but wouldn't feel too bad doing it if the situation arose.
I've seen the debate on here before about hunting a stand left on public. If its the right tree or only tree for a given spot and I'm there first, I would think about it, though generally assume if there is a permanent stand that seems to be getting used I'm better off moving on. Always varied responses there too. Personally, I don't see the harm in it, and wouldn't object to others doing the same for a cam I put out. Now deleting their pics so they get bad intel or something of that nature I wouldn't support.
I agree that deleting is wrong...maybe even deleting the images of me is wrong. What are your thoughts on deleting pics of me? I could honestly give a strong argument that they deserve that intel as well. I would like to know someone has been in the area. Although i can usually tell when someone has been in an area i frequent.
CRK925 wrote:Why is this even a debate?
My 3rd grade teacher taught me the golden rule. Treat others how you wish to be treated. Don't mess with other people's stuff. Simple as that.
stash59 wrote:Watched a video on placing cams for elk, out in AZ. Each watering hole must have had a dozen different cams on it. No one messed with another's cam!!!!!
I'd be afraid of getting caught by the cam owner. My luck he'd be some big ornery baffoon, or a gun toting angry redneck!!! Either way I'd end up hurt!!!!
But if it involved something illegal. The cam just may get damaged!!!
CRK925 wrote:Why is this even a debate?
My 3rd grade teacher taught me the golden rule. Treat others how you wish to be treated. Don't mess with other people's stuff. Simple as that.
Kraftd wrote:CRK925 wrote:Why is this even a debate?
My 3rd grade teacher taught me the golden rule. Treat others how you wish to be treated. Don't mess with other people's stuff. Simple as that.
Again never done it, don't go looking for them, but I do agree with what you wrote. That said, if they didn't damage it, steal it, or erase pics, I wouldn't give a second thought to someone doing the same to me. Just not something that would bother me. Given the overall tenor of the responses here, I'd probably think twice about doing it for the first time now.
NorthwoodsWiscoHnter wrote:I don't touch other people's property so I'd prefer them to return the favor. Typically I don't have a problem with other hunters with my cams (other than this season) since I'm generally the only bowhunter up by me. The bird hunters generally keep to themselves and keep on walking. The bear hunters up by me are a bit different and I cannot vouch for them.
sureshotscott wrote:Ten percent of cameras you find in the woods have been abandoned by someone who lost interest or died. At some point, you're doing everyone a favor by cleaning it up. Clean it up by stealing it? No. But inspecting it, noting how long it's been there, and borrowing the pics? Not a problem.
The ten percent number is a guess of course. But if you think 100% of all cams in the woods will be removed by their owners, you're wrong.
Randy Lahey wrote:This behavior is no different to me than someone going through my unlocked vehicle in the public parking lot and looking through my things. The other person purchased, set and maintains that camera and you are not entitled to the information from it. Access to the property is open to the public, but specific information about the animals utilizing the property is something you have to put in your own work for.
Eddiegomes83 wrote:Randy Lahey wrote:This behavior is no different to me than someone going through my unlocked vehicle in the public parking lot and looking through my things. The other person purchased, set and maintains that camera and you are not entitled to the information from it. Access to the property is open to the public, but specific information about the animals utilizing the property is something you have to put in your own work for.
If you don't think I put in my own work you're wrong. I work harder than any other Hunter I personally know. And I would say a vehicle is much more personal than a trail cam. So that's a little bit of an extreme comparison but understand where you're going with it. Kind of how I said I wouldn't want someone going through my cell phone if I left it laying around but again a little extreme because it's more personal
Randy Lahey wrote:Eddiegomes83 wrote:Randy Lahey wrote:This behavior is no different to me than someone going through my unlocked vehicle in the public parking lot and looking through my things. The other person purchased, set and maintains that camera and you are not entitled to the information from it. Access to the property is open to the public, but specific information about the animals utilizing the property is something you have to put in your own work for.
If you don't think I put in my own work you're wrong. I work harder than any other Hunter I personally know. And I would say a vehicle is much more personal than a trail cam. So that's a little bit of an extreme comparison but understand where you're going with it. Kind of how I said I wouldn't want someone going through my cell phone if I left it laying around but again a little extreme because it's more personal
The amount of work you put in doesn't negate the fact you're taking advantage of someone else's. Someone else's property is their property regardless how insignificant you perceive it to be.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests