mkuf79 wrote:It's hard to go by track size since there are a lot of 200 lb plus 110-120 inchers running. around.
I agree, The Wisconsin northwoods grows big bodied bucks with smallish racks. I disagree that big tracks will often lead to 110-120" bucks. I have hunted Bayfield county for a couple decades, and my take is, if you can find an area with 3.5 finger width tracks or better, the bucks leaving those tracks is usually 130" or better. 150" is about the usual top end buck in the Wisconsin northwoods ( Bayfield county anyways). This ain't Iowa. The winters are harsh and the food is tougher to come by. But the bodies of bucks are BIG!
I use to run trail cams up there that i would set out in July and leave till mid November. I started by leaving them in funnels. After I found the Beast (5 years ago), I eventually figured out to set the cams in areas that have alot of POTENTIAL buck beedding (based on topos and aerials). I started getting pix of mature bucks. I also noticed that when i set the cams where I saw BIG tracks near SUSPECTED buck bedding I would get the most pix of big bucks.
Placeing cams out in the bigwoods is alot of work for me since i live 7 hours away. Using cameras up there and paying close attention to tracks and droppings (the last 5 years) has shown me that I can be just as succesful observing only tracks and droppings and not running cams at all. For me, I am a better hunter (in bayfield county Wisconsin ) by not using cams and simply finding the fresh big tracks and droppings. But let me be clear, I NEEDED the cams to verify to me that the sign I was finding was gonna help my hunting. Now, I feel I can kill a bigwoods pig without the use of a trail cam.