Possible new MI state record typical

Unread postby **Uncle Lou** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:34 pm

Got my WoodsNWater magazine the other day and this was on the cover.
http://www.woods-n-waternews.com/Articl ... pical.html

Potential firearm record. It is a typical 12 pt with a 22" inside spread. Just waiting for the 60 day period to end for official scoring. Pushing 200"

If someone else put this up earlier I apologize, I been on the deer forum about as much as I got to deer hunt this fall.

The story said the guy was a meat hunter and was in the right place right time

Unread postby **exojam** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:39 pm

Dang that is a nice one.

Unread postby **keb** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:52 pm

Wow! Big Michigan buck

[ Post made via iPad ]

Unread postby **Haus86** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:54 pm

Big deer, but I'm not seeing 200" net.????

[ Post made via Android ]

Unread postby **Jackson Marsh** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:29 pm

Awesome buck!

[ Post made via Android ]

dreaming bucks · Unread postby **dreaming bucks** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:50 pm

i'm not believing it until Stanleys big buck goo rue friend hear's about it.

[ Post made via Android ]

Unread postby **Mario** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:50 pm

Smooth bore Bunnelli with iron sights at 198 yards?

In high winds and snow... I would like to see the ballistics chart on that...

But non the less a nice deer

[ Post made via Android ]

Unread postby **BassBoysLLP** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:53 pm

dreaming bucks wrote:i'm not believing it until Stanleys big buck goo rue friend hear's about it.

[ Post made via Android ]

Unread postby **BassBoysLLP** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:56 pm

mt008 wrote:Smooth bore Bunnelli with iron sights at 198 yards?

In high winds and snow... I would like to see the ballistics chart on that...

But non the less a nice deer

[ Post made via Android ]

Cannonball!

Unread postby **Jackson Marsh** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:59 pm

BassBoysLLP wrote:
dreaming bucks wrote:i'm not believing it until Stanleys big buck goo rue friend hear's about it.

[ Post made via Android ]

Stan's skepticism proved correct.

[ Post made via Android ]

Unread postby **BigHunt** » Fri Jan 03, 2014 2:30 am

I thought there were no big deer in Michigan

Nice buck

[ Post made via Android ]

Unread postby **Uncle Lou** » Sat Jan 04, 2014 2:43 am

BigHunt wrote:I thought there were no big deer in Michigan

Nice buck

[ Post made via Android ]

Here you go Bighunt, a few more tiny MI deer.
http://www.q1buckpole.com/region/list?y ... region=All

Unread postby **BigHunt** » Sat Jan 04, 2014 2:46 am

Uncle Lou wrote:
BigHunt wrote:I thought there were no big deer in Michigan

Nice buck

[ Post made via Android ]

Here you go Bighunt, a few more tiny MI deer.
http://www.q1buckpole.com/region/list?y ... region=All

Nice...see you guys have some nice deer

[ Post made via Android ]

Unread postby **BassBoysLLP** » Sat Jan 04, 2014 2:46 am

Uncle Lou wrote:
BigHunt wrote:I thought there were no big deer in Michigan

Nice buck

[ Post made via Android ]

Here you go Bighunt, a few more tiny MI deer.
http://www.q1buckpole.com/region/list?y ... region=All

Unread postby **MOBIGBUCKS** » Sat Jan 04, 2014 2:54 am

Man, what a deer! :shock:

Possible new MI state record typical

Possible new MI state record typical

Re: Possible new MI state record typical

Re: Possible new MI state record typical

Re: Possible new MI state record typical

Re: Possible new MI state record typical

Re: Possible new MI state record typical

Re: Possible new MI state record typical

Re: Possible new MI state record typical

Re: Possible new MI state record typical

Re: Possible new MI state record typical

Re: Possible new MI state record typical

Re: Possible new MI state record typical

Re: Possible new MI state record typical

Re: Possible new MI state record typical

Re: Possible new MI state record typical

Who is online